Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 918 SW2D 847 - State v. Tracy

State v. Tracy’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Grim · State v. Dulany · State v. O'BRIEN · State v. Rodden · State v. Gilmore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, violation of ‘the rule’ does not automatically warrant the exclusion of the witness who violates the rale. To the contrary, it is only when certain ‘special circumstances’ exist that a trial court should exclude the testimony of a witness who violates the witness exclusion rule. As a general rale, these ‘special circumstances’ exist only where there is proof that the witness violated the rale with ‘the consent, connivance or procurement of the party or counsel calling him.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.