Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 919 A.2d 397 - State v. Drew

State v. Drew’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jenkins v. Anderson · Luce v. United States · United States v. Henry · McGautha v. California · State v. Singh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““You should consider the interest or lack of interest of the witness, if any, in the outcome of the case, and the bias or the prejudice of the witness, if any, as well as any criminal record that a witness may have. “You may consider whether a witness would have a motive to be truthful or untruthful in his or her testimony, and you may further consider the probability or the improbability of the truth of a witness’s testimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.