Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 919 F.2d 1014 - Ucc v. Jb Haralson

Ucc v. Jb Haralson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Rubinstein v. Collins (1994), Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd. (2004)

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 19 state decisions

200199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Basic Inc. v. Levinson · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Rubin v. United States · Jones v. Nor-Tex Agencies, Inc. · Foy v. Northeast Suburban Life

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fraud plaintiff's individual characteristics, abilities, and appreciation of facts and circumstances at or before the time of the alleged fraud--it is extremely unlikely that there is actual reliance on the plaintiff's part.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “particularly disinclined to entertain claims of justifiable reliance when sophisticated plaintiff has access to information that would reveal fraud at a time when harm could be averted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To succeed in a common law fraud action, a plaintiff's reliance ... must be justifiable as well as actual”.). See also Steiner v. Southmark, 734 F.Supp. at 279 (declining to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.