Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 919 F.2d 1044 - Bode v. United States

Bode v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

919 F.2d 1044 · 1990

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Huffman v. Commissioner (1992), Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter v. Cedar Point Oil Co. (1996)

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

460199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7430 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Pierce v. Underwood · Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jean · Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Clearly, counsel's expertise in tax law, in and of itself, is not a special factor warranting a fee award in excess of $75 per hour under section 7430.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the limited availability of qualified attorneys for such proceeding”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[s]pecial legal expertise about the quarterhorse industry may well have qualified as a special factor,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.