Missouri Housing Development Commission v. Brice’s Empirical Analysis
919 F.2d 1306 · 1990
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 24 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Schott Motorcycle Supply, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co. (1992), Setco Enterprises Co. v. Robbins (1994)
19 federal appellate · 24 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963)
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Lombard v. Marcera · Leroy v. Great Western United Corp. · Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Florida Nursing Home Ass'n · Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“even if the post-pleading evidence conflicts with the evidence in the pleadings, admissions in the pleadings are binding on the parties and may support summary judgment against the party making such admissions.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(b) Amendments to Conform to the Evidence. When issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings. Such amendment of the pleadings as may be necessary to cause them to conform to the evidence and to raise these issues may be made upon motion of any party at any time, even after judgment; but failure so to amend does not affect the result of the trial of these issues. If evidence is objected to at the trial on the ground that it is not within the issues made by the pleadings, the court may allow the pleadings to be amended and shall do so freely when the presentation of the merits of the action will be sub-served thereby and the objecting party fails to satisfy the court that the admission of such evidence would prejudice the party in maintaining the party’s action or defense upon the merits. The court may grant a continuance to enable the objecting party to meet such evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“claim arose” language in section 1391 with “a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred....” 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (a)(2) & (b)(2) (1994 & Supp.1997). Even though many federal cases have determined that a claim”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.