Montes’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably Western Radio Services Co. v. Espy (1996), Malik v. Meissner (1996)
6 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · Jean v. Nelson · International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Brock · Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) agency expertise makes agency consideration necessary to generate a proper record and reach a proper decision; (2) relaxation of the requirement would encourage the deliberate bypass of the administrative scheme; and (3) administrative review is likely to allow the agency to correct its own mistakes and to preclude the need for judicial review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may have sole jurisdiction to review alleged procedural irregularities in an individual deportation hearing to the extent these irregularities may provide a basis for reversing an individual deportation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the district court had no authority to rule on the merits of the underlying issue of deportability or entitlement to discretionary relief as to any individual,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.