Korea Shipping Corp. v. Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
919 F.2d 601 · 1990
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co. · Lauritzen v. Larsen · Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. · Hellenic Lines Limited v. Rhoditis · Lake Tankers Corp. v. Henn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must apply foreign limitation law if the substantive liability of the parties is governed by a foreign law and if the limitation law of the foreign country is such an integral part of the substantive law governing the action that it can be said to 'attach' to the substantive liability law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If either of the two conditions is not met, then U.S. courts apply the rule in [Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Mellor (The Titanic), 233 U.S. 718 (1914)]: U.S. limitation law controls.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.