Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 919 F.3d 1081 - Hill v. Snyder

Hill v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis

919 F.3d 1081 · 2019

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 727

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Chorosevic v. MetLife Choices · Fix v. First State Bank · Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Falcon Products, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.