Juarez-Coronado v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
919 F.3d 1085 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Eusebio v. Ashcroft · Guled v. Mukasey · Davila-Mejia v. Mukasey · Mouawad v. Gonzales · Martinez Carcamo v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“adopted the findings or the reasoning of the [immigration judge], we also review the [immigration judge's] decision as part of the final agency action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determine that it would not be possible for a reasonable fact-finder to adopt the BIA's position.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.