U.S. v. Rang’s Empirical Analysis
919 F.3d 113 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 2422 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act))
Relies on Colorado v. Connelly · Moran v. Burbine · Pettyjohn v. United States · United States v. Rosario-Diaz · United States v. Berk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Constitution guards against compulsion by the state, not poor decision-making by defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“product of a free and deliberate choice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.