U.S. v. Pothier’s Empirical Analysis
919 F.3d 143 · 2019
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Sandstrom v. Montana · United States v. Spinney · United States v. Valerio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]o person shall be made to suffer the onus of a criminal conviction except upon sufficient proof -- defined as evidence necessary to convince a trier of fact beyond a reasonable doubt of the existence of every element of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a judge may not pursue a 'divide and conquer' strategy in considering whether the circumstantial evidence [] adds up . . ., neither may a judge 'stack inference upon inference in order to uphold the jury's verdict.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Pothier must have known that the illicit material was on his laptop because he was the only person who otherwise used [it], and therefore must have been the person who downloaded the pornography.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.