Kaplan v. Reed Smith LLP’s Empirical Analysis
919 F.3d 154 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2283
Relies on Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Taylor v. Sturgell · Smith v. Bayer Corp. · Lyndonville Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Lussier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the existence of a valid contract between the plaintiff and a third party, (2) the defendant's knowledge of that contract, (3) the defendant's intentional procurement of a third-party's breach of contract without justification, and (4) damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.