Duncan v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
919 F.3d 209 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 8 U.S.C. § 1186A (§ 216 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1431 (§ 320 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Gregory v. Ashcroft · Burrus · De Sylva v. Ballentine · Sessions v. Dimaya · Massis v. Mukasey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether - 17 - the BIA has applied the proper standard of review is a question of law for purposes of our jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Adeyanju v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.