Gaylor v. Mnuchin’s Empirical Analysis
919 F.3d 420 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 107 · 26 U.S.C. § 119 · 26 U.S.C. § 6532 · 26 U.S.C. § 911
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Lemon v. Kurtzman · Marks v. United States · Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New York · Lynch v. Donnelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To establish Article III standing, plaintiffs must show they have suffered '(1) a concrete and particularized injury in fact (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant, and that is (3) likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.