U.S. v. Lyle’s Empirical Analysis
919 F.3d 716 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Gall v. United States · Bruton v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · South Dakota v. Opperman · Richardson v. Marsh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ome degree of 'standardized criteria' or 'established routine' must regulate these police actions . . . to ensure that impoundments and inventory searches are not merely 'a ruse for general rummaging in order to discover incriminating evidence'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must demonstrate a subjective expectation of privacy in the place searched, and that expectation must be objectively reasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The crux of a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons 14 to join together to accomplish something illegal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.