Staub v. Boeing Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · White v. York International Corp. · Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. · 90 Wash. 2d 384 - Holland v. Boeing Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the employee must prove that he or she was qualified to fill a vacant position, and that the employer failed to take affirmative measures to make such job opportunity known to the employee and to determine whether the employee was in fact qualified for such position.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“conduct[ing] an organized internal search for job openings ... and appoint[ing] a vocational counselor to assist him”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.