Blumel v. Mylander’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

cited by 83 later decisions

January 2018

most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 88 F. Supp. 2d 1355 - Kaplan v. Assetcare, Inc. (2000), 136 F. Supp. 2d 1271 - Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food Co., Inc. (2001)

2 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Scheuer v. Rhodes · City of Canton v. Harris · Gerstein v. Pugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“To impose Section 1983 liability on a [local government] actor for failing to act to preserve a constitutional right, a plaintiff must establish: (1) that he possessed a constitutional right which was deprived; (2) that the defendant had a policy or custom; (3) that the policy or custom constituted a deliberate indifference to the plaintiffs constitutional right; and (4) the policy or custom was the moving force behind the deprivation, (cites omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Blumel v. Mylander
“A person arrested and detained without a warrant has a constitutional right to have a judicial officer determine probable cause within the first forty-eight (48) hours, (cite omitted) ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Blumel v. Mylander
“his or her claims. Blumel v. Mylander, 919 F.Supp. 423, 425 (M.D.Fla.1996). At a minimum the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 9 F. Supp. 2d 1319 - Harris v. DIST. BD. TRUSTEES OF POLK COMMUNITY COLLEGE

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.