Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 919 SO2D 1047 - Young v. State

Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McClain v. State · Brown v. State · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · Brooks v. State · 534 So. 2d 1019 - Brown v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There are no statutes or case law stating that a defendant must receive a sentence proportionate to a sentence imposed on an accomplice. Sentences between co-defendants are, often times, different. Also, the recommendations in regards to sentencing come from the district attorney's office, and each judge makes an independent determination as to what the sentence should be. The duty of this Court is not to determine the working mind of the sentencing judge or to determine the reasons why the judge gave that sentence to the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is the duty of the appellant to provide authority in support of an assignment of error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Failure to cite legal authority in support of an issue is a procedural bar on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.