Dm v. Walker County Dhr’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · 564 So. 2d 950 - Ex Parte Beasley · 676 So. 2d 1322 - Ex Parte Bryowsky · State v. Property at 2018 Rainbow Drive · 486 So. 2d 408 - Hall v. Mazzone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]ailure by the parents to maintain consistent contact or communication with the child”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[W]hen the juvenile court has not made specific factual findings in support of its judgment, we must presume that the juvenile court made those findings necessary to support its judgment, provided that those findings are supported by the evidence.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“"If the court finds from clear and convincing evidence, competent, material, and relevant in nature, that the parents of a child are unable or unwilling to discharge their responsibilities to and for the child, or that the conduct or condition of the parents is such as to render them unable to properly care for the child and that such conduct or condition is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future, it may terminate the parental rights of the parents."”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.