Nelson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State · 347 So. 2d 957 - Branch v. State · 515 So. 2d 1154 - Burney v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is elementary that a party seeking reversal of the judgment of a trial court must present this Court with a record adequate to show that an error of reversible proportions has been committed and that the point has been procedurally preserved.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“This Court `must decide each case by the facts shown in the record, not assertions in the brief.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.