Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 919 SO2D 30 - Chambliss v. State

Chambliss v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · 667 So. 2d 1242 - Ballenger v. State · 469 So. 2d 68 - Edwards v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e will only disturb a verdict when it is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence that to allow it to stand would sanction an unconscionable injustice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person is guilty of aggravated assault if he (a) attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another, or causes such injury purposely, knowingly or recklessly under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`the act itself, surrounding circumstances, and expressions made by the actor with reference to his intent.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.