919 So. 2d 481 - State v. Douglas’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 101 So. 2d 373 - Mead v. State · 170 So. 2d 340 - State v. Adjmi · 154 So. 2d 812 - Moore v. City of Winter Garden · Young v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[S]ubsequently-filed informations `will not be subject to the statute of limitations when they are shown to be connected with and in continuation of a prosecution timely begun.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Labrador v. State“sufficient linkage exists in this case and that the charge should not [be] dismissed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Labrador v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.