Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 670 So. 2d 1042 - Roberts v. State · LeDuc v. State · Snodgrass v. State · 629 So. 2d 888 - Scott v. State · 744 So. 2d 1232 - State v. Wiita
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“two forms stating that he had not been coerced into relinquishing his rights by entering a plea . . . [and][w]hen asked whether he was satisfied with his attorney's services, Williams said `yes'.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]here the coercion alleged is legally insufficient or conclusively refuted by the record, there is no need to hold an evidentiary hearing or appoint conflict-free counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[b]ecause [defendant's] motion to withdraw [his] plea made no factual allegations of `coercion' that were not completely refuted by the sworn plea colloquy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.