Ferryman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Matlock · 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · Melbourne v. State · Friedrich v. State · 817 So. 2d 841 - Armstead v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]hird-party consent . . . is valid where it arises out of the mutual use of property by persons having joint access, or common authority over, or other sufficient relationship to the premises or effects to be inspected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.