In Re Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State · 537 So. 2d 435 - Cheatham v. Cheatham · Newell v. Hinton · 279 So. 2d 642 - Shelton v. Kindred · 440 So. 2d 318 - Mason v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have on many occasions held that we must decide each case by the facts shown in the record, not assertions in the brief, however sincere [the appellant] may be in those assertions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Facts asserted to exist must and ought to be definitely proved and placed before us by a record, certified by law; otherwise, we cannot know them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Before an issue may be assigned and argued in this Court, it must first be presented to the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.