Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 A3D 172 - State v. Roger Watkins

State v. Roger Watkins’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · State v. Burke · State v. Lynch · State v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test to determine whether or not an item of evidence is cumulative 'is a retrospective one, administered at the close of all the evidence to determine whether the admission of certain evidence was harmless in light of all the evidence admitted on that point.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he admission of hearsay evidence is not prejudicial when the evidence is merely cumulative and when [the] defendant's guilt is sufficiently established by proper evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Under this standard, this Court will uphold the trial justice's ruling unless a clear 'abuse of discretion that prejudices the complaining party is shown.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.