State v. Puckett’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2002 · most notably 11 Ariz. App. 532 - State v. Reynolds (1970), 4 Ariz. App. 55 - Bade v. Drachman (1966)
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gori v. United States · State v. McGee · Westover v. State · Application of Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The general rules of law in this area are well established. Jeopardy' attaches after the proceedings in a criminal trial have commenced, and once attached, unless removed for some legal reason, the one in jeopardy cannot be again tried for the same offense. Ap plication of Williams, 85 Ariz. 109 , 333 P.2d 280 (1959); Westover v. State, 66 Ariz. 145 , 185 P.2d 315 (1947). The prime issue thus becomes whether the reason given by the judge for declaring the mistrial was such a legal reason.” 92 Ariz. at 409 , 377 P.2d at 780 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Burruell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.