92 Ark. App. 293 - Renderos v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Srivenugopala Gattem v. Gonzales · 87 Ark. App. 370 - Heape v. State · People v. Framer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““3: to make petition to: ENTREAT, IMPORTUNE ...; esp.: to approach with a request or plea (as in selling or begging) ... 4: to move to action ... 7: to endeavor to obtain by asking or pleading: plead for ...; also to seek eagerly or actively 10: to serve as a temptation ... [.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Neely v. McDaniel“that the statute should be read ... as to require that inducement be expressed verbally where there is evidence of unambiguous nonverbal inducement”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Krol v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.