92 Ark. App. 472 - Clark v. Casebier’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Myers v. Yingling (2008), 2011 Ark. App. 224 - Strother v. Mitchell (2011)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Riddick v. Streett · 87 Ark. App. 172 - Robertson v. Lees · 69 Ark. App. 219 - Hedger Bros. Cement & Materials, Inc. v. Stump · 62 Ark. App. 208 - Lammey v. Eckel · 66 Ark. App. 208 - Ward v. Adams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Arkansas law does not support the establishment of a boundary by acquiescence along an invisible line between two large land forms, such as levees, that are not truly capable of being used as accurate markers of a boundary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crum v. Siems“they and their grantees are precluded from claiming that the boundary line thus recognized and acquiesced in is not the true one, although it may not be.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Myers v. Yingling
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.