92 Ark. App. 95 - Collins v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2021
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 197 Ill. 2d 60 - Norskog v. Pfiel · Old Republic Insurance Company v. Alexander · Riverdale Development Co. v. Ruffin Building Systems, Inc. · Balentine v. Sparkman · Ginsburg v. Ginsburg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An implied permission ... is not confined to affirmative action, but means an inferential permission, in which a presumption is raised from a course of conduct or | ^relationship between the parties in which there is a mutual acquiescence or lack of objection signifying consent. But implied permission is not limited to such situations, and will be evaluated in light of all facts and circumstances surrounding the parties. Implied permission may be proved by circumstantial evidence. Circumstances such as usage, practice, or friendship may be used to show implied permission. It may be found that the insured has given implied permission where the named insured has knowledge of a violation of instructions and fails to make significant protest. [[Image here]] If the owner of an automobile forbids another person from driving the automobile, but the other person continues to do so with the knowledge of the owner, then the owner has given implied permission to drive the automobile.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.