Pritchard v. Eberhardt (In Re Eberhardt)’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
March 1997
most recently cited
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 525 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Scharffe v. Perkins · Wheeler v. Laudani · Perkins v. Scharffe · Duffey v. Dollison · Turner v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Failure to insure against Workmen’s Compensation claims ... produced only the potential for harm. Acts producing only the potential for harm or injury are negligent but not willful ... unless the harm will inevitably follow defendant’s wrongful act. Here, failure to insure does not inevitably cause harm; an uninsured employer may never have a claim resulting in a damage judgment against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.