Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 Cal. App. 2d 129

Talley v. Goodfellow

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1949

California Court of Appeal · decided 1949-05-27

Relies on Cunningham v. Taylor

Decided 1949-05-27

ADAMS, P. J.

¶1On January 13, 1949, respondent filed in this court a notice of motion to dismiss this appeal, which notice was accompanied by a certificate of the clerk of the *130trial court in conformity with rule 42(a) of the Rules on Appeal, and an affidavit of due service upon appellant’s counsel. The clerk’s certificate shows that on December 7, 1948, appellant’s attorneys were notified of the cost of preparing the transcript on appeal and that they made no arrangement for paying such cost. No record has been filed in this court nor has appellant filed any request for relief from default, nor any objection to this motion. On the hearing date before us, March 4, 1949, appellant made no appearance.

¶2Under these circumstances the appeal must be dismissed, not only for failure of appellant to arrange for payment of the cost of the record, but also because, under rule 41(c) of the Rules on Appeal, such appeal may be deemed abandoned. See Cunningham v. Taylor, 87 Cal.App.2d 701, 702 [197 P.2d 565] and authorities there cited.

¶3The appeal is dismissed.

¶4Peek, J., and Thompson, J., concurred.

/92/calapp2d/129 · .json · Public domain