Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 CALAPP2D 196 - People v. Cordero

People v. Cordero’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2017

17 state decisions

8019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Newland · 27 Cal. 2d 220 - People v. Williams · People v. Perkins · People v. David · 2 Cal. 2d 714 - People v. Latona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a defendant takes the witness stand, he waives the provisions of section 1025 of the Penal Code. [Citing cases.] As long as the prosecutor does not go beyond the fact of the prior convictions and the nature of the prior crimes committed, the questions are proper. (People v. David, 12 Cal.2d 639 [ 86 P.2d 811 ].) This rule applies even though such evidence may tend to prejudice the defendant in the eyes of the jury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.