People v. Stinchcomb’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 1973 · most notably 10 Cal. 3d 72 - In Re Benoit (1973), 58 Cal. 2d 133 - In Re Martin (1962)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lisenba v. People of State of California · In Re Lindley · People v. Slobodion · People v. Lisenba · 33 Cal. 2d 534 - In Re Horowitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The defendant asserts that the transcripts of the proceedings in all of the courts which have heard his matters have been rigged and falsified by the reporters and attorneys for the People. These transcripts were made by. official reporters, sworn to do their duty, and this court finds no evidence of any changing or falsification of the record.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stinchcomb v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.