Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 Colo. 439

21 P.2d 714

Mitchell v. Sheets

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 17, 1933

Supreme Court of Colorado · decided 1933-04-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1943

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1933-04-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Moore

¶1 delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2 Clara Sheets, the granddaughter of William H. Sheets, deceased, recovered a judgment against his estate in the county court of Prowers county based upon a claim for services rendered as housekeeper, nurse and attendant for the deceased for nine years prior to his death. An *440 appeal was taken to the district court and upon a trial to the court, the court found: ‘ ‘ That the claimant rendered services for the said decedent as his housekeeper and assistant, under an agreement between the father of this claimant and the deceased, for a period of approximately 373 weeks; and that a reasonable compensation for such services is seven dollars per week, over and above the hoard, clothing and other expenses of maintenance. That the total amount due this claimant, from the said estate, is $2,611.00,” and entered judgment accordingly, to review which this writ is prosecuted.

¶3 The record discloses that in January, 1920, William H. Sheets and his wife were aged people living alone in Lamar, Colorado; that Mrs. Sheets became sick and upon request of her husband, his son, E. E. Sheets and his daughter Clara, the claimant, who- were then living in Kay county, Oklahoma, came to Lamar and Clara took charge as housekeeper, nurse and companion. Mrs. Sheets died about six weeks later and the claimant remained in the same capacity with her grandfather until his death some nine years later. For a period of about a year and a half, Clara’s father bore her expenses, hut in the fall of 1921, William H. Sheets agreed with his son that if Clara would remain with him, he would bear all her expenses and in addition would “pay her well.” This arrangement was communicated to Clara who, consenting thereto, performed the services for which compensation is here sought.

¶4 Plaintiff in error claims that Clara Sheets was a member of the family of William H. Sheets and her services were rendered gratuitously. A sufficient answer is that the record contains ample evidence to sustain the finding of the court above quoted.

¶5 Judgment affirmed.

¶6 Me. Chiee Justice Adams and Me. Justice Butlee concur.

/92/colo/439 · .json · Public domain