Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 Colo. 532 - French v. Mitchell

French v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 1974
most recently cited

1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1974

1 district · 7 state decisions

2019331940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Von Trotha v. Bamberger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The right of a party who has done acts in part execution of a verbal contract, to call upon a court of equity to enforce it against the other, is subject to the same general restrictions as that of any other plaintiff in equity.... It must... appear that his position is such that an action at law for damages will not afford him adequate relief. (emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.