Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Amacker

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1898.)

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1898-02-07

<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United Stales for the District of Montana.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1899

1 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on Amacker v. Northern Pac. R.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1898-02-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United Stales for the District of Montana.

¶2F. M. Dudley and Wm. Wallace, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

¶3Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This case has once before been before this court, and is reported in 7 C. C. A. 518, 58 Fed. 850, where the judgment of the lower court was reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial. The record in the present case shows the facts to be substantially the same as those appearing on rhe former hearing, and the judgment below, being in accordance with the ruling of this court when the case was then here, must be affirmed. The former decision has become the law of the case. Judgment affirmed.