Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 F.1d 912 - In re Thomas

In re Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

92 F. 912 · 1899

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
November 1980
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 14 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 1980 · most notably Crawford v. Burke (1904), Henry Friend v. James Talcott (1913)

8 federal appellate · 14 district ·

1101899190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. Forsyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The duty of proving that such ground [of objection] exists is on the objecting creditor. * * * But the judge neither seeks to discover grounds nor supplies lack of specification.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.