No. 95-6267’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Commonwealth v. All That Certain Lot or Parcel of Land Located at 605 University Drive (2014), In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative &" ERISA" Litigation (2007)
1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boyd v. United States · Austin v. United States · United States v. Ursery · United States v. United States Coin & Currency · Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean Society
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When probable cause is based on evidence that the participants are generally engaged in the drug business over a period of time, have no other source of income, and that the properties were bought with the income produced from that drug business, it is not necessary to identify specific drug transactions in the complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Evidence that claimants are generally engaged in the drug business over a period of time, have no visible source of substantial income, use cash for large purchases, and are nominee owners is all probative evidence of probable cause, as is a history of drug violations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This burden is met either by rebutting the government's evidence that the property was purchased with proceeds of illegal drug activities or a showing that the claimant is an 'innocent owner' who did not know of the property's connection with drug sales.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.