Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 F.3d 1181

Docket No. 95-7729.

Isaac Eugene Slappy v. Charles W. Vanmeter, Regional Hearing Officer Paul W. Brewton, Investigator Scott Porter, Inmate Representative

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted July 23, 1996. Decided July 30, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-07-30

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 1997 · most notably Rendelman v. Keohane (1996), Slappy v. State (1997)

28 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-07-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-93-2277-7-22BD)

Isaac Eugene Slappy, Appellant Pro Se. William Benson Darwin, Jr., HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, COTHRAN, GUNN & BRADFORD, P.A., Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Slappy v. Vanmeter, No. CA-93-2277-7-22BD (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/92/f3d/1181 · .json · Public domain