Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 F.3d 1184

Docket No. 96-6192.

Williams v. State T

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 23, 1996. Decided: August 2, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-08-02

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Grace Wilson v. Southern National Bank of North Carolina

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-08-02

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-94-2500-3-18-BC)

Mark Aubrey Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. South Carolina, No. CA-94-2500-3-18-BC (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/92/f3d/1184 · .json · Public domain