Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

92 F.3d 1189

Docket No. 96-1881.

Rand v. Rand

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 17, 1996 Filed: July 26, 1996

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Relies on United States v. Vanornum · Smith v. T Runyon Jr Pmg

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Marsha Rand appeals the district court's1 dismissal of her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because her notice of appeal was not filed within the thirty-day time period provided by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1), we lack jurisdiction. See United States v. Vanornum, 912 F.2d 1023, 1025 (8th Cir.1990). Accordingly, we dismiss. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

1

The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa

/92/f3d/1189 · .json · Public domain