Mee Sook Sasaki v. Class’s Empirical Analysis
92 F.3d 232 · 1996
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Marie Evans Muriel Evans v. Terrace Avery et al. (1996), United States v. Jeffery (2011)
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Farrar v. Hobby · Sloan v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when a jury's damages award itself indicates ... strongly that the error substantially influenced the jury's verdict, the error cannot be dismissed as harmless.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“errors relating to damage awards do not require reversal of liability determinations if the two issues are not inextricably interwoven.” Sasaki, 92 F.3d at 238. Notably, Horne acknowledges that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“rare case in which a reviewing court will find error in the trial court’s conduct....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. United States v. Hsu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.