Kuciemba v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
92 F.3d 496 · 1996
Citation profile
27 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably Iliev v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1997), Kerciku v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2003)
27 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang · Gebremichael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Hector · Shahandeh-Pey v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Ivezaj v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a petitioner must produce `concrete evidence' indicating that the due process violation `had the potential for affecting' the outcome of the hearing.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to the alien or to his spouse, parent, or child, who is a citizen. 8 U.S.C. § 1254. Like the asylum provision, once these statutory criteria are satisfied, the grant of suspension is within the Attorney General's discretion. Here, the immigration judge found that Najafi satisfied the first two requirements, presence and character, and that, given the equities of the situation, the Attorney General would, if she could, grant suspension. However, Najafi failed to establish”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Board added there was no evidence in the record to suggest that Urban would be unable to receive adequate medical care in Poland. Four members dissented, and Urban petitioned this court for review. 12 In order to establish eligibility for suspension of deportation, Urban was required to prove that she: has been physically present in the United States for at least 7 years; is of good moral character; and is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.