Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 92 F.3d 672 - Roe v. Chater

Roe v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis

92 F.3d 672 · 1996

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
February 2021
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 13 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Goff v. Barnhart (2005), 969 F. Supp. 1167 - Laird v. Stilwill (1997)

27 federal appellate · 13 district ·

4401996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bowen v. City of New York · Robinson v. Sullivan · Thomas v. Sullivan · Naber v. Shalala

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Testimony from a VE based on a properly-phrased hypothetical question constitutes substantial evidence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “more telling than a chronicle of [claimant's] various ailments are his actual activities, which are incongruous with his contention that he cannot work”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Guards industrial or commercial property against fire, theft, vandalism, and illegal entry, performing any combination of following duties: Patrols, periodically, buildings and grounds of industrial plant or commercial establishment, docks, logging camp area, or work site. Examines doors, windows, and gates to determine that they are secure. Warns violators of rule infractions, such as loitering, smoking, or carrying forbidden articles, and apprehends or expels miscreants. Inspects equipment and machinery to ascertain if tampering has occurred. Watches for and reports irregularities, such as fire hazards, leaking water pipes, and security doors left unlocked. Observes departing personnel to guard against theft of company property. Sounds alarm or calls police or fire department by telephone in case of fire or presence of unauthorized persons. Per mits authorized persons to enter property. May register at watch stations to record time of inspection trips. May record data, such as property damage, unusual occurrences, and malfunctioning of machinery or equipment, for use of supervisory staff. May perform janitorial duties and set thermostatic controls to maintain specified temperature in buildings or cold storage rooms. May tend furnace or boiler. May be deputized to arrest trespassers. May regulate vehicle and pedestrian traffic at plant entrance to maintain orderly flow. May patrol site with guard dog on leash. May watch for fires and be designated Fire Patroller (logging). M”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.