United States v. Borjesson’s Empirical Analysis
92 F.3d 954 · 1996
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Halper · United States v. Ursery · Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch · United States v. Stoller · United States v. Bizzell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]or does [appellant's] characterization of his predicament matter. '[w]hether a sanction constitutes punishment is not determined from the defendant's perspective, as even remedial sanctions carry the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is the clear intent of debarment to purge government programs of corrupt influences and to prevent improper dissipation of public funds. Removal of persons whose participation in those programs is detrimental to public purposes is remedial by definition. While those persons may interpret debarment as punitive, and indeed feel as though they have been punished, debarment constitutes the “rough remedial justice” permissible as a prophylactic governmental action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In the case of debarment, a non-monetary sanction, quantification is out of the question. Ursery, not Halper must guide us.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.