Daniels v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 2010
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Central Intelligence Agency v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity · Nettles v. Wainwright · Bloodsworth v. Heckler · Lewis v. Callahan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.