92 F. Supp. 2d 697 - Turner v. Wilkinson’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Rhodes v. Stewart · James Snyder v. Sidney Trepagnier · Webster v. Sowders · Wooldridge v. Marlene Industries Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]ven if the PLRA limitations do apply under such circumstances, the Court perceives of no logical way to separate the attorney's fees expended on behalf of the two plaintiffs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]here would be no discernable way to separate the attorney's fees expended on behalf of the two plaintiffs ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.