State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 district · 50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably State v. Kalama (2000), Bynum v. Magno (2004)
1 district · 50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Schmerber v. State of California · Rochin v. People of California · South Dakota v. Neville · Winston v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'inherent supervisory power to curb abuses and promote a fair process which extends to the preclusion of evidence' ” and holding that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the proponent of a motion to suppress has the burden of establishing not only that the evidence sought to be excluded was unlawfully secured, but also, that his or her own ... rights were violated”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Taua
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.