State v. Klinge’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
55 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably State v. Wakisaka (2003), State v. Kalaola (2010)
55 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · Schad v. Arizona · Richardson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“operate[s] to denigrate the legal profession in general.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Pasene. · State v. Meyer“Factors considered are: (1) the nature of the conduct; (2) the promptness of a curative instruction; and (3) the strength or weakness of the evidence against the defendant.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Benedicto · State v. FUNN“Allegations of prosecutorial misconduct are reviewed under the harmless beyond a reasonable doubt standard, which requires an examination of the record and a determination of whether there is a reasonable possibility that the error complained of might have contributed to the conviction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.